Map: dynojet vs. fuelmoto - Road Glide Forums
ECM/Fuel Management systems ECM/Fuel Management systems For Road Glides

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 4 (permalink) Old 02-26-2017, 01:01 PM Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 417
Map: dynojet vs. fuelmoto

I just made the update to stage 1 to my RGU, one of the reasons to choose the V&H round twin slash slips on was dynojet having a map ready to go from them.
Because I got the new POWERVISION license from fuelmoto they provided me a canned map for the same exhausts.
The main difference between the two is in the AFR table, the fuelmoto one seems leaner in many area than the dynojet one.
Road tested both maps, the fuelmoto seemed giving a little more thrust, but the heat from the cat was sensibly high, and the exhaust noise was not comfortable as if it was in resonance.
Dynojet was a different story, lot more cooler on cat side and pleasant noise at all speed. Little less thrust but smooth in every condition and no feeling of strangled performance as I was feeling in stock.
I decided to keep the dynojet setting, main reason to stage 1 was to cool down the cat.

Last edited by Beaver; 02-27-2017 at 03:43 AM.
Beaver is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 4 (permalink) Old 02-27-2017, 11:50 AM
EFI tuning and Exhaust Expert
 
fuelmoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 806
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beaver View Post
I just made the update to stage 1 to my RGU, one of the reasons to choose the V&H round twin slash slips on was dynojet having a map ready to go from them.
Because I got the new POWERVISION license from fuelmoto they provided me a canned map for the same exhausts.
The main difference between the two is in the AFR table, the fuelmoto one seems leaner in many area than the dynojet one.
Road tested both maps, the fuelmoto seemed giving a little more thrust, but the heat from the cat was sensibly high, and the exhaust noise was not comfortable as if it was in resonance.
Dynojet was a different story, lot more cooler on cat side and pleasant noise at all speed. Little less thrust but smooth in every condition and no feeling of strangled performance as I was feeling in stock.
I decided to keep the dynojet setting, main reason to stage 1 was to cool down the cat.
If you have a 2014-2016 bike I personally developed both calibrations, the one posted on the Dynojet site uses their standard AF table which is really only slightly richer at tip in, our map was developed based on what we feel offers the best combination of mileage, performance, and throttle response. However the rest of the calibration is the same and the FM map. Good to go either way.

Jamie Long / Fuel Moto USA

Dynojet Power Vision info is here
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


The USA's source for EFI Tuning, exhaust, & engine components

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Contact 920-423-3309
Email
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
fuelmoto is offline  
post #3 of 4 (permalink) Old 02-27-2017, 12:28 PM Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 417
I assume that the difference in feeling is coming from the fact that here in Europe the gasoline is different from USA, then even little differences in AFR might produce different effects in terms of heat.
Like I said, the fuelmoto map seemed to provide more "power feeling", but heat reduction is more important for me.
Glad to know you developed both, you made me happy anyhow

Last edited by Beaver; 02-27-2017 at 12:31 PM.
Beaver is offline  
 
post #4 of 4 (permalink) Old 04-14-2017, 02:05 PM Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 417
Today I tried again the fuelmoto map for my settings. I have to admit that after having used the dynojet one for a while I realized some roughness at highway speed, something that instead the fuelmoto does not have at all.
Talking about heat, at the end it is the same with both map, the cat is still there so there is nothing I can do about it.
I decided to keep on the fuelmoto, lot more pros if compared with dynojet!
Beaver is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Road Glide Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FuelMoto LED VS. Daymaker with pics fcheshir Lighting 21 11-20-2015 10:50 AM
Custom Map From Fuelmoto Black Smoke SMOKENJOE Map Section 3 04-14-2013 11:04 PM
2006 DynoJet PV1 Map HELP satwatchers ECM/Fuel Management systems 3 03-16-2013 03:27 PM
Fuelmoto map names SquirtRGU ECM/Fuel Management systems 2 05-08-2012 10:03 AM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome