to cam or not to cam? - Road Glide Forums
Engine Related Engine Builds and more for Road Glides

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 8 (permalink) Old 04-22-2014, 01:34 PM Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 31
to cam or not to cam?

New 1300 miles RGU with fuel moto stage 1 type air cleaner and screaming eagle pipes. Power Vision tuner. Im liking the change with these add ons and the bike pulls well, but I had a 103 with 255 cams on an 09 Road king and Im thinking about adding these to this bike - but is it worth the $.

I want/have to stay with harley cams because I have an extended warranty and will have them do it before 60 days from purchase is up - so they will be covered too.

Looking at the screaming eagle cams Im wondering about the 259 too. It looks like it comes on a little later than the 255 and stays on for higher RPM's

Im a big guy 290 lbs and I liked the torque from the 255's
bikerbehaviorist is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 8 (permalink) Old 04-22-2014, 02:52 PM
Grey beard
 
mocotom's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Pa
Posts: 1,110
There are better choices in cams for a 103 IMO, but if you can only use HD cams my suggestion (considering your total vehicle weight) would be the 255's.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

2005 RG 98cu in
USMC 1968-1972
mocotom is offline  
post #3 of 8 (permalink) Old 04-22-2014, 03:34 PM
Member
 
Redbeard77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Northwest Louisiana
Posts: 593
The 259s need more compression, so would be a bad choice for a cam-only job. You know the 255 from past experience, and the 254s are also a good option and carries the power curve a little further.
Also look into the 204s. They're not as strong as the 255 on the bottom end, but have a broad range and should make more hp overall.

Happiness is a warm motorcycle.
Redbeard77 is offline  
 
post #4 of 8 (permalink) Old 04-22-2014, 03:52 PM
Grey beard
 
sloride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 852
Quote:
Originally Posted by mocotom View Post
There are better choices in cams for a 103 IMO, but if you can only use HD cams my suggestion (considering your total vehicle weight) would be the 255's.
X2
sloride is offline  
post #5 of 8 (permalink) Old 04-22-2014, 11:03 PM
Hangaround
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 156
If it was me I would stick with the 255's. I was faced with the same decision and I'm loving the torque. I know there's better out there but that's the best HD cam for my needs.

2012 FLTRX
Sideways is offline  
post #6 of 8 (permalink) Old 04-23-2014, 02:46 AM
Grey beard
 
Taccone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,135
Garage
I have the se254e cams and love them! I have a cousin who has the 255's in his street glide and I always pull away slightly in a race. I'm not the better rider and our bikes are set up the same, the 255's just fall on their face in power early in rpms where the 254e cam's lets you build power too redline. The 254e cam's also don't destroy fuel mileage like the 255 torque monsters do. Riding both bikes they feel similar, the 255 does have a lil more low end grunt but the power quicly fades as the rpm's build, where the 254e cam just feels like a stock motor with just more power everywhere in the rpm band. There are much better choices for a cam for our bikes, but if staying with HD look at the 254e cam.

2012 Road Glide Custom Vivid Black named "Becky" with a simple motto "If it came from the factory like that, it doesn't belong on the bike!"
Taccone is offline  
post #7 of 8 (permalink) Old 04-23-2014, 05:56 AM
Grey beard
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Munnsville,N.Y.
Posts: 1,432
The 255 school bus/emission cams should not create poor fuel economy.
Perhaps a ride up to Corfu, N.Y., to vist Dan Thayer, Thayers Sales & Service, would/could correct that.
Scott
Hillsidecycle.com is offline  
post #8 of 8 (permalink) Old 04-23-2014, 07:59 AM
Prospect
 
equandt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 210
If I had to choose a SE cam to go with a 103 touring bike, it would be the SE204. I don't think you would be disappointed with a SE204. Pulls like a freight train down low and runs out pretty well to 5500 rpm.

Good luck

2012 FLTRX
2010 FLHTCU
equandt is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Road Glide Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
To cam or not to cam, that is the question.... mastergunnera8 Engine Related 16 02-20-2017 11:10 AM
2012 103: to Cam or not to Cam? 57Glide *General Road Glide Discussions/Pictures 13 02-09-2017 07:09 PM
Cam or not to cam! Tiz the question pipe3214 Engine Related 6 02-13-2015 03:59 PM
To Cam or not to Cam Mdwatson Intake and Exhaust 14 01-14-2015 12:55 PM
To Cam or Not To Cam is the Question? Cmathias Engine Related 29 07-11-2013 01:25 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome